Yakima County Vs. Toppenish -- A Fight That Should Be Fought
Yakima Herald-Republic › September 26, 2004
Linked as:
Yakima Herald-Republic › September 26, 2004
Linked as:Summary
By all means, Yakima County should go ahead with a damage claim against the city of Toppenish for money wasted on a site intended for a new county jail.
The public deserves some solid information and answers about this very expensive miscue.See the full content of this document
Extract
Yakima County Vs. Toppenish -- A Fight That Should Be Fought
By way of background, in December 2002 the county purchased the 38-acre site from Toppenish for $513,000. The property, a mi...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
State v. Franchi, (Ohio 2005) | 40 CFR 68.125 - Exemptions. | 40 CFR 63.1034 Closed vent systems and control devices or emissions routed to a fuel gas system or process standards. | 41 CFR 101-1.4900 Scope of subpart. | Sentencia nº 3437 de Consiglio di Stato July 06 2009 | Sentencia nº 5180 de Consiglio di Stato, November 10, 2010 | Sentencia nº 5782 de Consiglio di Stato, November 19, 2009 | Sentencia nº 3486 de Consiglio di Stato, July 30, 2011